Retos y oportunidades del diseño participativo en tecnología educativa

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1761

Palabras clave:

diseño participativo, codiseño, diseño de aprendizaje, tecnologia educativa

Resumen

El diseño participativo está teniendo una importante incidencia en el diseño de entornos de aprendizaje mediados por tecnología. Cada vez es más frecuente utilizar los enfoques participativos y de codiseño para involucrar a docentes y a estudiantes en el diseño de la tecnología para generar soluciones centradas en las necesidades de las personas que se verán afectadas al utilizarlas. El diseño participativo pretende involucrar a los grupos afectados desde el inicio del diseño, lo que implica tener en consideración la complejidad que supone dar voz a personas con conocimientos, necesidades y roles diferentes. El objetivo principal de esta contribución es analizar el papel actual del diseño participativo con relación a la investigación e innovación en tecnología educativa.  Se analiza el origen de este tipo de enfoque y las aplicaciones más habituales en el ámbito educativo. Posteriormente,  se describen los métodos que facilitaran la comunicación y colaboración entre las diseñadoras y participantes, se analizan los principios clave en el diseño participativo, y, finalmente, se exponen las implicaciones del diseño participativo para la investigación e innovación en tecnología educativa.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Aldridge, J. (2016). Participatory research: Working with vulnerable groups in research and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.

Baek, E. O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E. y Frick, T. (2007). User-centered design and development. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. En J.M. Spector, D. Merrill MD, J. van Merrienboer, M. Driscoll. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 660-668). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880869.ch49

Biesta, G. y Tedder, M. (2006). How Is Agency Possible? Towards an Ecological Understanding of Agency-as-Achievement. Learning Lives: Learning, Identity, and Agency in the Life Course. Working Paper Five, Exeter: Teaching and Learning Research Programme.

Bonsignore, E., Ahn, J., Clegg, T., Guha, M. L., Hourcade, J. P., Yip, J. C. y Druin, A. (2013). Embedding Participatory Design into Designs for Learning: An Untapped Interdisciplinary Resource?. En N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan y S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time, and Scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings, Volume 1 (pp.549-556).

Bovill, C. y Bulley, C.J. (2011) A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. En C. Rust (ed.) Improving Student Learning: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations. (pp. 176-188). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.

Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A. y Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690

Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Knudsen, J., Kyng, M. y Madsen, K. (1988). Computer support for cooperative design. En Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 377-394). https://doi.org/10.1145/179606.376379

Brandt, E. (2006). Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design?, En Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design, 1 (pp. 57-66). https://doi.org/10.1145/1147261.1147271

Bustamante, A. M., Degbelo, A. y Kray, C. (2018). Exploring Forced Migrants (Re) settlement & the Role of Digital Services. In Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work-Exploratory Papers. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET). https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2018

Carroll, J. M. (1999). Five Reasons for Scenario-Based Design. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International conference on system Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772890

Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H. J. y Könings, K. D. (2015). Teachers as participatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instructional Science, 43(2), 203-228. https://doi.org 10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0

Diaz, P., Paredes, P., Alvarado, D. y Giaccardi, E. (2012). Co-designing social games with children to support non formal learning. En 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 682-683). IEEE. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICALT.2012.22

DiSalvo, B., Yip, J., Bonsignore, E. y DiSalvo, C. (Eds.). (2017). Participatory design for learning: Perspectives from practice and research. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630830

Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology, 21(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110108659

Druin, A. (2014). Inclusive ownership of participatory learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 123–126. https://doi.org 10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0

Durall, E., Bauters, M., Hietala, I., Leinonen, T. y Kapros, E. (2020). Co-creation and co-design in technology-enhanced learning: Innovating science learning outside the classroom. Interaction Design and Architecture (s), 42, 202-226. https://bit.ly/2J11w5H

Durall, E., Leinonen, T., Gros, B. y Rodriguez-Kaarto, T. (2017). Reflection in learning through a self-monitoring device: Design research on EEG self-monitoring during a study session. Designs for Learning, 9(1), 10-20. https://doi.org 10.16993/dfl.75

Ehn, P. (1988). Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artefacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design. New York: ACM.

Fallman, D. y Stolterman, E. (2010). Establishing criteria of rigour and relevance in interaction design research. Digital Creativity, 21(4), 265-272. https://doi.org 10.1080/14626268.2010.548869

Feenberg, A. (2017). A Critical Theory of Technology. En U. Felt, R. Fouché, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 635–663). Cambridge, MA: MIT press. https://doi.org 10.4135/9781446282229.n9

Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G. y Iversen, O. S. (2015). In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 93-106. https://doi.org 10 1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004

Garcés Dávila, A.L. (en prensa). Revitalización de saberes ancestrales y diseño participativo. Co-diseño de un juego comunitario. PDC 2020.

Gros, B. (2002). Constructivismo y diseño de entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista de Educación, mayo–agosto, 225. https://bit.ly/2V1sb4r

Gros, B. y Maniega, D. (2018). Co-Designing Apps to Support the Learning Needs of Migrants in Barcelona (Spain). Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(3), 465-480. https://bit.ly/2Jae5LY

Frauenberger, C., Good, J. y Alcorn, A. (2012, June). Challenges, opportunities and future perspectives in including children with disabilities in the design of interactive technology. En Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 367-370).

Iversen, O. S., Smith, R. C. y Dindler, C. (2017). Child as protagonist: Expanding the role of children in participatory design. En Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 27-37). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079725

Jungk, R. y Müllert, N. (1987). Future workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures. London: Institute for Social Invention.

Kensing, F. y Madsen, K. H. (1991). Generating visions: Future workshops and metaphorical design. En J. Greenbaum y M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (pp.155-168). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Laanpere, M., Pata, K., Normak, P. y Põldoja, H. (2014). Pedagogy-driven design of digital learning ecosystems. Computer Science and Information Systems, 11(1), 419-442. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS121204015L

Leinonen, T., y Durall, E. (2014). Design thinking and collaborative learning. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-10.

Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M. y Toikkanen, T. (2016). Mobile apps for reflection in learning: A design research in K‐12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12224

Mattelmäki, T. (2006). Design probes. Ph.D. Aalto University School of Art and Design.

McNally, B., Kumar, P., Hordatt, C., Mauriello, M. L., Naik, S., Norooz, L., Shorter, A., Colub, E. y Druin, A. (2018). Co-designing mobile online safety applications with children. En Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1-9). https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3173574.3174097

Muller, M. J. y Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 24-28.

Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J. y Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 2(01), 51-74. https://doi.org/ 10.1142/S1793206807000300

Põldoja, H. (2016). The Structure and Components for the Open Education Ecosystem-Constructive Design Research of Online Learning Tools. Ph.D. Aalto University School of Art and Design. Helsinki: Aalto University Publication Series. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/23535

Rinaudo, M. y Donolo, D. (2010). Estudios de diseño. Una perspectiva prometedora en la investigación educativa RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 22, 11-29. https://bit.ly/33iGF4C

Robertson, T. y Simonsen, J. (2012). Challenges and opportunities in contemporary participatory design. Design Issues, 28(3), 3-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1162/DESI_a_0015

Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. y Shechtman, N. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. En Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences (pp. 606-612). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Sabiescu, A., de Moor, A. y Memarovic, N. (2019). Opening up the culture black box in community technology design. AI & Soc 34, 393–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00904-z

Sanders, E. (2002). From user-centered to participatory design approaches. En Design and the social sciences (pp.18-25). CRC Press.

Sanders, E. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Sanders, E. B. N., Brandt, E. y Binder, T. (2010). A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. En Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference (pp. 195-198).

Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15710882.2014.888183.

Smith, R. C., Bossen, C., Dindler, C. y Iversen, O. S. (2020). When Participatory Design Becomes Policy: Technology Comprehension in Danish Education. En Participatory Design Conference Biennial Participatory Design Conference. ACM. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/3385010.3385011

Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Maldonado, H. y Pea, R. (2009). Integrating co-design practices into the development of mobile science collaboratories. En 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp.393-397). IEEE. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICALT.2009.175

Taxén, G. (2004). Introducing participatory design in museums. En Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices, 1 (pp. 204-213). https://doi.org/10.1145/1011870.1011894

Toikkanen, T., Keune, A. y Leinonen, T. (2015). Designing Edukata, a participatory design model for creating learning activities. En Re-engineering the Uptake of ICT in Schools (pp.41-58). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-19366-3_3

Ravenscroft, A., Rainey, C., Dellow, J., Brites, M. J., Auwärter, A., Balica, M., Rees A., Camilleri A. F., Jorge, A., Dahn, I. y Fenech J. (2015). RadioActive Europe: promoting engagement, informal learning and employability of at risk and excluded people across Europe through internet radio and social media. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4645.4888

Willis, J. y Wright, K. E. (2000). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: The new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40(2), 5-20. https://bit.ly/33iGXse

Ye, X., Zhang, B. y Chia, P. (2010). A tripartite model of co-designing for an iMVT integrated science curriculum. En S. L. Wong, S.C. Kong y F.-Y. Yu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 145-152). Malaysia: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E. y Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 310-319). ACM. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/1858171.1858228

Descargas

Publicado

21-12-2020

Cómo citar

Gros, B., & Durall, E. (2020). Retos y oportunidades del diseño participativo en tecnología educativa . Edutec, Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (74), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1761

Número

Sección

Número especial: Codiseño de situaciones educativas enriquecidas con TIC