Digital competences operationalization in the literature (2001-2016). A meta-synthesis

Authors

  • David Arturo Acosta Silva Corporación Universitaria Unitec (Colombia)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.70.1397

Keywords:

competence, skill, young persons, ICT

Abstract

Research on young people's digital competencies has reported conflicting results, conceivably produced by the diversity of theoretical positions that underlie these studies. This suggests the need to continue with the digital competencies construct review. One way to proceed is by the analysis of its operationalization. Therefore, we carried out a meta-synthesis of 50 studies that explored digital competencies empirically. Our results indicate some problems with the operationalization, so it was concluded the need to keep improving it, which could allow the generation of more comprehensive competencies proposals and reduce inaccuracies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, D. A. (2017). Tras las competencias de los nativos digitales: Avances de una metasíntesis. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 471-489.

Acosta, D. A. y Vasco, C. E. (2013). Habilidades, competencias y experticias: Más allá del saber qué y del saber cómo. Bogotá: Corporación Universitaria Unitec y Universidad de Manizales-Cinde.

Aesaert, K., y van Braak, J. (2015). Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences. Computers & Education, 84, 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017

Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union. Recuperado de http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu.

Bennett, S., Maton, K., y Kervin, L. (2008). The «digital natives» debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x

Bondas, T., y Hall, E. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 113-121. doi:10.1177/1049732306295879

Cabra-Torres, F., y Marciales-Vivas, G. (2009). Mitos, realidades y preguntas de investigación sobre los 'nativos digitales': una revisión. Universitas Psychologica, 8(2), 323-338.

Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., y Ranieri, M. (2008). Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4(3), 183-193.

Cha, S. E., Jun, S. J., Kwon, D. Y., Kim, H. S., Kim, S. B., Kim, J. M., ... y Kim, H. C. (2011). Measuring achievement of ICT competency for students in Korea. Computers & Education, 56(4), 990-1002. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.003

Cohen, L., Manion, L., y Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education [Métodos de investigación en educación] (6ª ed.). Nueva York: Routledge.

Esteve, F. M., y Gisbert, M. (2013). Competencia digital en la educación superior: instrumentos de evaluación y nuevos entornos. Enl@ce Revista Venezolana de Información, Tecnología y Conocimiento, 10(3), 29-43.

Feldmann, A., y Whitt, W. (1998). Fitting mixtures of exponentials to long-tail distributions to analyze network performance models. Performance evaluation, 31(3-4), 245-279. doi:10.1016/S0166-5316(97)00003-5

Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Sevilla: JRC-IPTS.

Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., y Redecker, C. (2012). Understanding digital competence in the 21st century: An analysis of current frameworks. En A. Ravenscroft, S. Lindstaedt, C. Kloos y D. Hernández-Leo (Eds.), 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. EC-TEL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7563 (pp. 79-92). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_7

Gui, M., y Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389751

Ilomäki, L., Kantosalo, A., y Lakkala, M. (2011). What is digital competence? En Linked portal. Bruselas: European Schoolnet. Recuperado de: http://linked.eun.org/web/guest/in-depth3

Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., y Sloep, P. (2013). Experts' views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473-481. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008

Kantosalo, A., Ilomäki, L., y Lakkala, M. (2011). What should be assessed when assessing digital competences? En Linked portal. Brussels: European Schoolnet. Disponible en: http://linked.eun.org/web/guest/in-depth11

Litt, E. (2013). Measuring users' internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society, 15(4), 612-630. doi:10.1177/1461444813475424

Lynham, S. A. (2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines [El método general de la investigación que construye teoría en las disciplinas aplicadas]. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221-241. doi:10.1177/1523422302043002

Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., y Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004

Miles, M., y Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2a ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Miles, M., Huberman, M., y Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (3a ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Mouton, J., y Marais, H. C. (1996). Basic concepts in the methodology of the social sciences (Ed. rev.). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Ogden, J. (2012). Theory and measurement: Conceptualization, operationalization and the example of health status. En A. Vingerhoets (Ed.), Assessment in behavioral medicine (pp. 73-90). Nueva York: Brunner-Routledge.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 1. The Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816

Roig, R., y Pascual, A. M. (2012). Las competencias digitales de los futuros docentes. Un análisis con estudiantes de Magisterio de Educación Infantil de la Universidad de Alicante. @tic. Revista d'innovació Educativa, (9), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.7203/attic.9.1958

Sandelowski, M., y Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative health research, 13(7), 905-923. doi:10.1177/1049732303253488

Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native – myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379. doi:10.1108/00012530910973776

Timulak, L. (2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 591-600. doi:10.1080/10503300802477989

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., y van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(10), 891-916. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.496338

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J. & Eynon, R. (2014). Measuring digital skills. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report. Disponible en: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=112

Published

27-12-2019

How to Cite

Acosta Silva, D. A. (2019). Digital competences operationalization in the literature (2001-2016). A meta-synthesis. Edutec, Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (70), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2019.70.1397