Design of a script to develop peer feedback in a digital scenario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.72.1583Keywords:
Peer feedback, SOOC model, digital scenarios, scripAbstract
Digital educational settings require the design of assessment methods that promote participation, cognitive activity, and collaboration among students. In this sense, in the peer evaluation stage of the SOOC methodology, peer feedback is emphasized as a process that contributes to their learning. The objective of this work was to design a script to elaborate a peer feedback considering the characteristics of the feedback that the apprentices made during this stage in an online course. The most frequent categories were found to be identification, courtesy, training, motivation and appropriation, showing a degree of reflective thinking. Likewise, the categories of motivation and courtesy provide affective traits that contribute to collaborative learning and the category interrogation favors questions to request clarity to the activity being evaluated. For this reason, the six categories are used to propose a script to elaborate feedback that favors to student and peer learning that can be used in the future in the SOOC methodology.
Downloads
References
Ekahitanond, V. (2013). Promoting university students' critical thinking skills through peer feedback activity in an online discussion forum. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 247-265.
Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Gielen, M. y De Wever, B. (2012). Peer assessment in a wiki: Product improvement, students' learning and perception regarding peer feedback. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.450
Gielen, M. y De Wever, B. (2015). Scripting the role of assessor and assessee in peer assessment in a wiki environment: Impact on peer feedback quality and product improvement. Computers y Education, 88, 370-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.012
Lin, G. Y. (2018). Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system. Computers y Education, 116, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010
Liu, N. F. y Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher education, 11(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
Liu, E. Z. F. y Lee, C. Y. (2013). Using peer feedback to improve learning via online peer assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 187-199.
Miranda, G. A., Delgado, Z. Y. y Meza, J. M. (2017). Visualización de la toma de decisiones en la representación de problemas en un modelo de curso abierto en línea con énfasis social. XIV Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa COMIE. San Luis Potosí, México.
Miranda, G. A., Delgado, Z. Y. y Meza, J. M. (2019). Tipos de retroalimentación entre pares en un curso en línea basado en la metodología SOOC. Ponencia presentada en el XII Congreso Internacional EDUTEC. Lima, Perú.
Miranda, G. A., Delgado, Z. Y. y Meza J. M. (2020). Diseño de secuencias instruccionales SOOC. Guía del docente. México: Educación y Cultura Libre.
Nelson, M. M. y Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
Nilson, L. B. (2003). Improving student peer feedback. College teaching, 51(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596408
Smith, H., Cooper, A. y Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: a case study from psychology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000110102904
Strijbos, J. W. y Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002
Tsai, C. C., y Liang, J. C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0
Tseng, S. C. y Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers y Education, 49(4), 1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
Van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., y Simons, P. R. J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003
Wahid, U., Amine, M. y Schroeder U. (2016) Improving Peer Assessment by using Learning Analytics. 14th e-Learning Conference of the German Computer Society. Potsdam, Germany.
Wen, M. L., y Tsai, C. C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701794050
Yu, F. Y., y Wu, C. P. (2013). Predictive effects of online peer feedback types on performance quality. Journal of Educational Technology y Society, 16(1), 332-341.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the paper, the authors assign the publication rights to the journal Edutec. For its part, Edutec authorises its distribution as long as its content is not altered and its origin is indicated. At the end of each article published in Edutec, the citation procedure is indicated.
The management and editorial board of Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa do not accept any responsibility for the statements and ideas expressed by the authors in their work.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
