Learning co-design and the use of ICT in higher education: a systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1799Keywords:
learning co-design, ICT, higher education, systematic literature reviewAbstract
This systematic literature review (SLR) presents the biliometric characteristics of the articles selected, the way staff and students co-design within the curriculum of a subject using information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education, and the benefits and challenges of this process. To crib the articles, we selected four inclusion criteria: source (Scopus and Redalyc database), language (Spanish and English), period of time (2014-2019), and context (staff-student co-design within the curriculum of a subject using ICT in higher education). Results shows that there is not a unify method to be followed in order to co-design in higher education. Furthermore, learning co-design seems to have several challenges, nonetheless, those same challenges seem to be also the ones that makes the staff-student partnership beneficial. However, as to overcome these obstacles and accomplish the learning process successfully, some requirements are suggested by the primary studies' authors. As this research shows, there is still a need to keep investigating on how learning co-design takes place while using ICT in higher education. Therefore, a learning co-design model that uses educational technology through didactic sequences should be design. Furthermore, an inquiry on how staff-student co-design assessment while using ICT should be carried out.
Downloads
References
Blau, I. y Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting "student voice" and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L. y Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A. y Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
Bovill, C. y Bulley, C. J. (2011). A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility. Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations., July, 176–188.
Brown, N. (2019). Partnership in learning: how staff-student collaboration can innovate teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(5), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1652905
Bryson, C. (2016). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2016.1124966
Deeley, S. J. y Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Dollinger, M., Liu, D., Arthars, N. y Lodge, J. M. (2019). Working together in learning analytics towards the co-creation of value. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.2
Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2019). Student-staff co-creation in higher education: an evidence-informed model to support future design and implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(5), 532-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681
Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G. y Boudhraâ, S. (2016). A new representational ecosystem for design teaching in the studio. Design Studies, 47, 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.003
Doyle, E., Buckley, P. y Whelan, J. (2019). Assessment co-creation: an exploratory analysis of opportunities and challenges based on student and instructor perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(6), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1498077
Felten, P., Bovill, C. y Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching (1): benefits and challenges – what do we know? International Consortium for Educational Development Conference. https://bit.ly/3m3GeCB
González, A. A., Roig, A. E., Suari, N. O. y Juanola, M. M. (2016). Aprendizaje-servicio y codiseño en la formación de maestros: Vías de integración de las experiencias y perspectivas de los estudiantes. Bordon, 68(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2016.68211
González Fernández, M. O., Becerra Vázquez, J. J. y Olmos Cornejo, J. E. (2018). Promoción de la autogestión a través de objetos de aprendizaje adaptativos en alumnos de educación superior. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 63. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2018.63.1037
Gros, B. (2019). La investigación sobre el diseño participativo de entornos digitales de aprendizaje. 1–69. https://bit.ly/2V5Zi7e
Gros, B. y López, M. (2016). Students as co-creators of technology-rich learning activities in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0026-x
Guirao Goris, S. J. A. (2015). Utilidad y tipos de revisión de literatura. Ene, 9(2), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1988-348x2015000200002
Hanni-Vaara, P., Kähkönen, O. y Paloniemi, P. (2019) Developing Destination Experience and Digital Marketing in Co-creation Process – Case Cooperation of Ranua Municipality and Lapland University of Applied Sciences. e-Review of Tourism Research, 17(2). https://ertr-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/ertr/index.php/ertr/article/view/512
Haraldseid, C., Friberg, F. y Aase, K. (2016). How can students contribute? A qualitative study of active student involvement in development of technological learning material for clinical skills training. BMC Nursing, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0125-y
Healey, M., Flint, A. y Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. https://bit.ly/367I8N9
Jussila, J., Raitanen, J., Partanen, A., Tuomela, V., Siipola, V. y Kunnari, I. (2019). Rapid Product Development in University- Industry Collaboration: Case Study of a Smart Design Project. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(3). https://bit.ly/2KLz3kV
Kalantzis, M. y Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-Learning, 7(3), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200
Kaminskiene, L., Žydžiunaite, V., Jurgile, V. y Ponomarenko, T. (2020). Co-creation of learning: A concept analysis. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.2.337
Könings, K. D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F. y Stassen, L. (2020). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464
Manrique-Losada, B., Zapata Cárdenas, M. I. y Arango Vásquez, S. I. (2020). Entorno virtual para cocrear recursos educativos digitales en la educación superior. Campus Virtuales, 9(1), 101–112. https://bit.ly/376UJPW
Mcfaul, H., Fitzgerald, E., Byrne, D. y Ryan, F. (2020). A mobile app for public legal education : a case study of co-designing with students. Research in Learning Technology, 28(1063519), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2434
Mercer-mapstone, L., Bovill, C., Mercer-mapstone, L. y Bovill, C. (2019). Studies in Higher Education Equity and diversity in institutional approaches to student – staff partnership schemes in higher education partnership schemes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2541–2557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1620721
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R. y Swaim, K. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Pee, L. G. (2020). Enhancing the learning effectiveness of ill- structured problem solving with online co-creation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2341-2355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1609924
Petticrew, M. y Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Púñez, M. (2015). Evaluación para el aprendizaje: una propuesta para una cultura evaluativa. Horizonte de la Ciencia, 5(8), 87–96. https://bit.ly/39fMLGC
Sanders, E. B.-N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Silva, M. y Rossi, F. (2018). Technological Forecasting & Social Change The e ff ect of fi rms ' relational capabilities on knowledge acquisition and co- creation with universities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 133(May 2017), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.004
Treasure-Jones, T., Dent-Spargo, R. y Dharmaratne, S. (2018). How do students want their workplace-based feedback visualized in order to support self-regulated learning? Initial results & reflections from a co-design study in medical education. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2193.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M. y Buntins Eds, K. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the paper, the authors assign the publication rights to the journal Edutec. For its part, Edutec authorises its distribution as long as its content is not altered and its origin is indicated. At the end of each article published in Edutec, the citation procedure is indicated.
The management and editorial board of Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa do not accept any responsibility for the statements and ideas expressed by the authors in their work.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
