The teaching professional ethical knowledge and its presence in the inclusion of technologies in the present educational context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2022.80.2345Keywords:
professional ethics, teaching digital competence, technology, teachers intrainingAbstract
The objective of this study is to analyze the professional ethical knowledge of teachers in the use of technologies by teachers in training. Starting from the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model to measure the correct inclusion of technologies in the classroom, a descriptive mixed methodological design study has been carried out. The instruments used were the Likert scale questionnaire and the personal interview, both organized in four dimensions on the professional ethical knowledge, the ethics of technology, the pedagogical technological ethics and the disciplinary technological ethics of future teachers. The questionnaire was applied to a sample of 632 professors in training from a European university in the context of COVID-19 and 429 students participated in the interview.
The findings revealed little or no training in professional ethical knowledge of the teachers in training; the need to deepen such knowledge to face the current, pandemic and post-pandemic context of education and the importance of including the ethical component in the TPACK model for a correct and ethical implementation of digital resources in the classroom.
Downloads
References
Anderson, K. (2005). Christian ethics in plain language. Thomas Nelson Inc.
Argibay, J. C. (2009). Muestra en investigación cuantitativa. Subjetividad y Procesos Cognitivos, 13(1), 13-29. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339630252001
Asamoah, M. K. (2019). TPACKEA Model for Teaching and Students' Learning. J Acad Ethics 17, 401-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09326-4
Atun, H. y Usta, E. (2019). The effects of programming education planned with TPACK framework on learning outcomes. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 6(2), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.10.6.2
Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Palacios Rodríguez, A. y Llorente-Cejudo, C.(2020). Marcos de Competencias Digitales para docentes universitarios: su evaluación a través del coeficiente competencia experta. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(3), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.414501
Cohen, L.; Manion, L. y Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
Fraenkel, J. R. y Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Ganote, C. y Longo, P. (2015). Education for social transformation: infusing feminist ethics and critical pedagogy into community-based research. Critical Sociology, 41(7/8), 1065-1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514537843
Gao, T., Siegel, P., Johar, J. S. y Sirgy, M.J. (2008). A Survey of Management Educators' Perceptions of Unethical Faculty Behavior. J Acad Ethics 6, 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9062-z
García-Parra, M., y Pérez Sepulcre, M. (2021). Vínculos entre Ética, Tecnología Educativa y Pedagogía Hospitalaria: una revisión sistematizada de la literatura. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, 77, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.77.2121
Ghiațău, R. M. y Mâță, L. (2019). Factors influencing higher education teachers' attitudes towards unethical use of information technology: A review. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 11(1), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/111
Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2020). Digital Teaching Competence and Space Competence with TPACK in Social Sciences. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(19), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.14923
Gómez Trigueros, I.M., Ortega Sánchez, D. y García Cobas, R. (2021a). Brecha digital de género y coeducación: claves conceptuales y orientaciones metodológicas (1a ed.). Aula Magna Proyecto Clave McGraw Hill.
Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., Ponsoda, S. y Díez, R. (2021b). Towards an Insertion of Technologies: The Need to Train in Digital Teaching Competence. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3), 64-87. http://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.8652
Higgs-Kleyn, N. y Kapelianis, D. (1999). The Role of Professional Codes in Regarding Ethical Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 363-374. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005899517191
Landeta, J. (2002). El método Delphi. Una técnica de previsión para la incertidumbre. Ariel.
Mâtă, L. y Boghian, I. (2019). Perception of Teachers in Higher Education towards Ethical Issues of Information Technology Use. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/183
Mâță, L., Clipa, O. y Tzafilkou, K. (2020). The development and validation of a scale to measure university teachers' attitude towards ethical use of information technology for a sustainable education. Sustainability, 12(15), 6268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156268
Mishra, P. y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Ortega-Sánchez, D., Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., Trestini, M. y Pérez-González, C. (2020). Self-Perception and Training Perceptions on Teacher Digital Competence (TDC) in Spanish and French University Students. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(4), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4040074
Pardo, A., Ruiz, M.A. y San-Martín, R. (2015). Análisis de datos en ciencias sociales y de la salud I. Síntesis.
Raykov, T. y Marcoulides, G.A. (2017). Ecuation of true criterion validity for unidimensional multicomponent measuring instruments in longitudinal studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 24(4), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1172486
Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., Rodrigues, A. I. y Costa, A. P. (2018). Desde los métodos cualitativos hacia los modelos mixtos: tendencia actual de investigación en ciencias sociales. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, 28, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.17013/risti.28.0
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
UNESCO (2018). Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002614/261445e.pdf
World Health Organization (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World Health Organization, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128
Yurdakul, I. K., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K, Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G. y Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPCK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
Zhu, X. y Liu, J. (2020). Education in and After Covid-19: Immediate Responses and Long-Term Visions. Postdigit Sci Educ, 2, 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3
Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254-262 https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the paper, the authors assign the publication rights to the journal Edutec. For its part, Edutec authorises its distribution as long as its content is not altered and its origin is indicated. At the end of each article published in Edutec, the citation procedure is indicated.
The management and editorial board of Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa do not accept any responsibility for the statements and ideas expressed by the authors in their work.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
