"Antiplagiarism" tools: are they reliable? Case study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2017.61.919Keywords:
Academic plagiarism, antiplagiarism tools, academic honesty, academic writing, antiplagiarism software, reproducibilityAbstract
The performance of four online tools to detect copy-paste from Internet sources (Small Seo Tools, Duplickecker, Search Engine Report and Turnitin) was re-evaluated after a year of use. The General Similarity Index was significantly reduced in the Small Seo Tools, Search Engine Report and Turnitin. The number of essays given as positive for plagiarism was also decreased in Duplichecker. The failure rate to detect possible copy-paste rose significantly from two to five times only in free tools. Turnitin showed an acceptable reproducibility, whereas Duplichecker and Search Engine Report, had a poor performance. These results suppose a defect in the operation of these free tools.
Funding
UNIDAD EDUCATIVA PARTICULAR SANTANA-UNESA.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the paper, the authors assign the publication rights to the journal Edutec. For its part, Edutec authorises its distribution as long as its content is not altered and its origin is indicated. At the end of each article published in Edutec, the citation procedure is indicated.
The management and editorial board of Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa do not accept any responsibility for the statements and ideas expressed by the authors in their work.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)